New publication: LiDAR-based simulation of tree-and stand development after bark beetle disturbances

New publication: LiDAR-based simulation of tree-and stand development after bark beetle disturbances

January 3, 2017

In a newly-published paper featuring Steven Hill and Hooman Latifi from Dept. of Remote Sensing, very high resolution remote sensing (laser scanner data and aerial orthophotos) were used in a full remote sensing-based framework to study post-disturbance tree and stand development, particularly in its early seral stages.

Future stand development on test sites 1–5 simulated for a period of 80 years. A) Number of trees (N) per test site. B) Basal area (BA) of trees per hectare. C) Mean tree height (MH). D) Tree height variation (MAD = mean absolute deviation).

 

The first step involved extraction of single trees and their allometric attributes form LiDAR-based canopy height models, after which the extracted tree locations were additionally validated by a sample based scheme implemented on aerial photos. The single tree based forest  growth simulator SILVA ver. 2.2 was then used to simulate the stand development during a 80 year simulation period. In addition, landscape and spatial point pattern metrics were calculated to assess the structural heterogeneity. The results approve that natural regeneration of post disturbed forest  stands reveal structural heterogeneity even at the early-seral stages. Furthermore, the study showed that the structural heterogeneity might already be determined in the early successional stages. following the bark beetle disturbances. This study open up interesting horizons in how remote sensing data and methods can be combined with spatial statistics to investigate early-phase forest dynamics in natural stands.

Further information on the published material can be found here.

Bibliography:

Hill, S., Latifi, H., Heurich, M., Müller, J. 2017. Individual-tree- and stand-based development following natural disturbance in a heterogeneously structured forest: a LiDAR-based approach. Ecological Informatics 38, 12-25. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2016.12.004

follow us and share it on:

you may also like:

Remote Sensing for Germany #2

Remote Sensing for Germany #2

Last year, we gave an overview of our remote sensing work on environmental issues having a special focus on Germany – https://remote-sensing.org/remote-sensing-for-germany-1/ . To follow on from this, we present today a selection of studies on spatial patterns...

Simon Plank gives a talk at GZS-Seminar at EOC of DLR

Simon Plank gives a talk at GZS-Seminar at EOC of DLR

On October 22, our habilitation candidate and guest lecturer from DLR, Dr. Simon Plank gave an inspiring talk at the seminar of the department "Georisks and Civil Security (GZS)" at the Earth Observation Center (EOC) of the German Aerospace Center (DLR). The talk was...

New paper ‘From Spatial to Platial Decision Support’ published

New paper ‘From Spatial to Platial Decision Support’ published

Three  years ago, at the Geolingual Studies Workshop (see here: https://remote-sensing.org/geolingual-studies-workshop-day-1/) researchers from very different disciplines developed ideas to explore how we can better understand the relationship between people and urban...

bzgl. Art. 50 Verordnung (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act):

Überwiegend werden eigene originäre Texte und Bilder des EORC genutzt, jedoch sind einige Inhalte von blog post Texten teilweise mit Hilfe von KI überarbeitet worden und einige Bilder sind ganz mit KI erstellt, die jedoch deutlich keine photorealistische Darstellungen abbilden. Aussnahmen sind KI generierte fernerkundliche Datensätze, die explizit für Forschungszwecke mit KI erstellt wurden, hier wird aber durch den assoziierten Text der wissenschaftliche Grund der KI generierten Bilder erläutert.

Share This