Review of Spaceborn Remote Sensing Application at the Science-Policy Interface published

Review of Spaceborn Remote Sensing Application at the Science-Policy Interface published

February 9, 2023

Our PhD student Alexandra Bell recently published a review on “Scientific Evidence from Space—A Review of Spaceborne
Remote Sensing Applications at the Science–Policy Interface” in cooperation with colleaques from the German Aerospace Center (DLR) in Remote Sensing. This work was conducted within our project WASCAL-DE-Coop.

From the abstract: On a daily basis, political decisions are made, often with their full extent of impact being unclear. Not seldom, the decisions and policy measures implemented result in direct or indirect unintended negative impacts, such as on the natural environment, which can vary in time, space, nature, and severity. To achieve a more sustainable world with equitable societies requires fundamental rethinking of our policymaking. It calls for informed decision making and a monitoring of political impact for which evidence-based knowledge is necessary. The most powerful tool to derive objective and systematic spatial information and, thus, add to transparent decisions is remote sensing (RS). This review analyses how spaceborne RS is used by the scientific community to provide evidence for the policymaking process. We reviewed 194 scientific publications from 2015 to 2020 and analysed them based on general insights (e.g., study area) and RS application-related information (e.g., RS data and products). Further, we classified the studies according to their degree of science–policy integration by determining their engagement with the political field and their potential contribution towards four stages of the policy cycle: problem identification/knowledge building, policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy monitoring and evaluation. Except for four studies, we found that studies had not directly involved or informed the policy field or policymaking process. Most studies contributed to the stage problem identification/knowledge building, followed by ex post policy impact assessment. To strengthen the use of RS for policy-relevant studies, the concept of the policy cycle is used to showcase opportunities of RS application for the policymaking process. Topics gaining importance and future requirements of RS at the science–policy interface are identified. If tackled, RS can be a powerful complement to provide policy-relevant evidence to shed light on the impact of political decisions and thus help promote sustainable development from the core.

The link to the full paper: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/4/940/pdf

you may also like:

Science Slam in Rosenheim: Hannes Taubenböck wins again

Science Slam in Rosenheim: Hannes Taubenböck wins again

After the completely surprising win of the Science Slam in Würzburg in November 2024 (we reported about it: https://remote-sensing.org/hannes-taubenbock-represents-eorc-at-the-science-slam-and-wins/), Hannes Taubenböck was invited to the Science Slam in Rosenheim. The...

Deep learning course by Thorsten Hoeser

Deep learning course by Thorsten Hoeser

This week Thorsten Hoeser, an expert in deep learning and data science, taught AI methods in remote sensing at our International EAGLE Earth Observation MSc Program. In this special module, Thorsten covered essential topics on the cutting-edge techniques for...

New Team Member: Sofia Haag

New Team Member: Sofia Haag

Sofia Haag joined the EORC in February 2025 as a research assistant for the EO4CAM project. After completing her Bachelor's degree in Geography at the University of Heidelberg, she pursued her Master's in Applied Physical Geography at the University of Würzburg. Sofia...