Review of Spaceborn Remote Sensing Application at the Science-Policy Interface published

Review of Spaceborn Remote Sensing Application at the Science-Policy Interface published

February 9, 2023

Our PhD student Alexandra Bell recently published a review on “Scientific Evidence from Space—A Review of Spaceborne
Remote Sensing Applications at the Science–Policy Interface” in cooperation with colleaques from the German Aerospace Center (DLR) in Remote Sensing. This work was conducted within our project WASCAL-DE-Coop.

From the abstract: On a daily basis, political decisions are made, often with their full extent of impact being unclear. Not seldom, the decisions and policy measures implemented result in direct or indirect unintended negative impacts, such as on the natural environment, which can vary in time, space, nature, and severity. To achieve a more sustainable world with equitable societies requires fundamental rethinking of our policymaking. It calls for informed decision making and a monitoring of political impact for which evidence-based knowledge is necessary. The most powerful tool to derive objective and systematic spatial information and, thus, add to transparent decisions is remote sensing (RS). This review analyses how spaceborne RS is used by the scientific community to provide evidence for the policymaking process. We reviewed 194 scientific publications from 2015 to 2020 and analysed them based on general insights (e.g., study area) and RS application-related information (e.g., RS data and products). Further, we classified the studies according to their degree of science–policy integration by determining their engagement with the political field and their potential contribution towards four stages of the policy cycle: problem identification/knowledge building, policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy monitoring and evaluation. Except for four studies, we found that studies had not directly involved or informed the policy field or policymaking process. Most studies contributed to the stage problem identification/knowledge building, followed by ex post policy impact assessment. To strengthen the use of RS for policy-relevant studies, the concept of the policy cycle is used to showcase opportunities of RS application for the policymaking process. Topics gaining importance and future requirements of RS at the science–policy interface are identified. If tackled, RS can be a powerful complement to provide policy-relevant evidence to shed light on the impact of political decisions and thus help promote sustainable development from the core.

The link to the full paper: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/4/940/pdf

follow us and share it on:

you may also like:

Crêpes, Culture, and a Dash of Friendly Competition at EORC 🥞

Crêpes, Culture, and a Dash of Friendly Competition at EORC 🥞

At EORC, science may bring us together—but sometimes, it’s a social activity - in this case: crêpes that makes a difference. Our recent social activity turned the kitchen into a lively hub of  culinary creativity as our French, Swiss and francophil colleagues took the...

From Satellites to Snow Angels

From Satellites to Snow Angels

Our EAGLE M.Sc. students, coming from all over the world, are making the most of the short breaks between courses. Whether it’s spontaneous snow angel sessions or friendly snowball fights around the EORC, laughter and flying snow are never far away. These moments of...

Where Learning Meets Friendship

Where Learning Meets Friendship

At EAGLE, studying together is only part of the story. Our students are more than classmates — they’re hiking buddies, party companions, and the kind of people who show up to lectures with birthday cakes 🎂. Today was a perfect example. Our EAGLE student Esperance from...

Share This