unsupervised classification with R

unsupervised classification with R

written by EORhub
m

January 29, 2016

Here we see three simple ways to perform an unsupervised classification on a raster dataset in R. I will show these approaches, but first we need to load the relevant packages and the actual data. You could use the Landsat data used in the “Remote Sensing and GIS for Ecologists” book which can be downloaded here.

library("raster")  
library("cluster")
library("randomForest")

# loading the layerstack  
# here we use a subset of the Landsat dataset from "Remote Sensing and GIS for Ecologists" 
image <- stack("path/to/raster")
plotRGB(image, r=3,g=2,b=1,stretch="hist")

RGBimage

Now we will prepare the data for the classifications. First we convert the raster data in a matrix, then we remove the NA-values.

## returns the values of the raster dataset and write them in a matrix. 
v <- getValues(image)
i <- which(!is.na(v))
v <- na.omit(v)

The first classification method is the well-known k-means method. It separates n observations into  k clusters. Each observation belongs to the cluster with the nearest mean.

## kmeans classification 
E <- kmeans(v, 12, iter.max = 100, nstart = 10)
kmeans_raster <- raster(image)
kmeans_raster[i] <- E$cluster
plot(kmeans_raster)

Kmeans

The second classification method is called clara (Clustering for Large Applications). It work by clustering only a sample of the dataset and then assigns all object in the dataset to the clusters.

## clara classification 
clus <- clara(v,12,samples=500,metric="manhattan",pamLike=T)
clara_raster <- raster(image)
clara_raster[i] <- clus$clustering
plot(clara_raster)

clara

The third method uses a random Forest model to calculate proximity values. These values were clustered using k-means. The clusters are used to train another random Forest model for classification.

## unsupervised randomForest classification using kmeans
vx<-v[sample(nrow(v), 500),]
rf = randomForest(vx)
rf_prox <- randomForest(vx,ntree = 1000, proximity = TRUE)$proximity

E_rf <- kmeans(rf_prox, 12, iter.max = 100, nstart = 10)
rf <- randomForest(vx,as.factor(E_rf$cluster),ntree = 500)
rf_raster<- predict(image,rf)
plot(rf_raster)

randomForest

The three classifications are stacked into one layerstack and plotted for comparison.

class_stack <- stack(kmeans_raster,clara_raster,rf_raster)
names(class_stack) <- c("kmeans","clara","randomForest")

plot(class_stack)

Comparing the three classifications:

Looking at the different classifications we notice, that the kmeans and clara classifications have only minor differences.
The randomForest classification shows a different image.

 

want to read more about R and classifications? check out this book:

you may also like:

Open short term position in Remote Sensing

Open short term position in Remote Sensing

Open short-term position (100%) in Remote Sensing Monitoring status and changes of the earth is essential for a sustainable management of our limited natural resources but also to ensure the functionality of our infrastructure. For a project dealing with the...

Internship and Inno Lab Presentations

Internship and Inno Lab Presentations

On Tuesday, 31st of January at 13 p.m. we will have the following presentations: Moritz Roesch: Spectral compositing for mapping bare soil areas and soil organic carbon estimation in Germany - Internship at RSS GmbH Lallu Nikerthil Prathapan: Landuse/ building type...